http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html James Higgins: Meanderings Jannis' PHPRss class - http://www.jannis.to/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:18:28 -0800 http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#50
James.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#50 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 -0800 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#30 Scroll down to view articles.

......................

Another CD. Cave Paintings.

Earth Day.

A New CD.

On the Passing of DB

Whats Oil For?

Earth Day.

Cave Painting.

The Childlife Montessori Teaching Adventure.

Harmonica Blues.

Cow Drums

Documentaries.

Me and Teddy Roosevelt.

Simple Thinking on a Radical Scale.

The case for Cheap instruments.

Stars and Holidays.

The Faceless Winter Olympics

How to Build and Play a Washtub Bass.

Earth Day 2009.

Brief Scottish History Lesson.

Economic Crisis and the Drug Industry.

Downtown Bellingham Open Mic Night.

Saving Scottish Football.

Pictures of the Hundred Acre Woods.

Perambulating Thoughts on the Road to California.

New CD.

Recording Progress

Pandering, Lies, and Wee Johnny The Cat.

Carbon Emission Moment.

News?

Spooky and Fun.

Mark Flanders: Ace Politition.

Stop Smoking Story.

Washtub News.

Earth Day.

Nada.

Neilston Quiz.

Bad Gig? No Such Thing. Czechoslozakia 1990-ish.

Lip Reading History.

The Busker: A Man For All Seasons.

Whiskey in the Jar.

Rustic Furniture.

A Package in the Post.

Sketch Pads and Cameras.

Karst Caves of Slovania.

Chuckanut Ridge: A Stream (or Watershed) of Thought.

Auld Dug.

Back Pack.

PA System Thoughts.

News and Weather.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#30 Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0800 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#49
This Cd was released back in Septenber but I forgot to mention it.
There were some great musicians on board on this outing. Aaron on double bass, Howie on Fiddle. Mark the Mud Man on guitar too.
Me and Mark had been jamming a lot just before I left the States. The basic track for “The Secret Circus” came out of one of those jams though the song itself goes back a couple of foggy years.

The Song Mama Mazama is about the changes in the spectacular Methow Valley on the East side of the Cascade Mountains. We have been going there every year for about 5 years or so. Even in that short time I’ve witnessed the inevitable trophy home sprawl creeping along the river like an invasive species. Actually I guess that's what they are.

Cardboard Box: A fun song about adventures in boxes.

The Contessa: A song about art and war. Folks want the art but not the artists.

Junk Shop: A song about decisions that seemed right at the time. But...

Garage Band: Maybe ”Garage” should be written with a silent B. As in Gar(b)age.
I recall years ago jamming up in Keith’s garage. I think a tape survived the encounter. Julie was banging on the drums, Jan was playing bass. Me and JB were on guitars. We were all off our heads. Keith’s mum was making tea.
We were thrashing “Brand New Cadillac” to death and having a blast at the neighbours’ expense. That’s all I remember. Except that outside, the night was torrential rain. Quite a racket: inside and out.
But we weren’t all thrash. We often had mellow moments like this song.
I like the stuttering end of this piece as it just fizzles and dies in true garage band style.

The Seine: A small moment in French time.

Painted Pony: For some reason I always thought that this song involved a random Irish guy. After all, the Irish (and Scots) are everywhere. Why wouldn’t there have been one at the Little Big Horn?
But I think it’s really about a Native American boy and his horse who go to war and discover strangers fighting strangers in the middle of nowhere. I guess more than humans died that day.

James Caird: A song about Shackleton’s expedition to the Antarctic and his subsequent rescue of his stranded crew.
I asked Aaron if he could give this song a sense of bleak haunting coldness. He immediately applied his bow to his double bass. I knew right away that was exactly what I wanted.
Unfortunately we recorded it in a slightly higher key than we usually played it which was a bit tougher on the voice.

Weeping Willow: Are people born to be who they are? Do events in life only exaggerate or diminish their essential character? We adapt to the soil but we really don’t change for longer than we need to.
This song is about a girl I once knew. She had a kind heart but it lived in a forest of anger.

Bouncy House: Some fun innuendo that hopefully goes over kids’ heads. We were in Regensburg last week and went passed the old neighbourhood “Bouncy House”. It looked quite respectable. It looked like it has become official apartments with longer leases than it was usually accustomed to.

Anyway, I hope you enjoy this collection. We had fun making it.
Hopefully this CD comes across as an honest reflection of the live music we were playing over the past few years: partly spooky, a bit stompy, and a touch melancholic with an ink smudge of interesting subject matter thrown in.
At the end, because I was leaving for Europe, I had to do some rush job mixing. The first copy or two may have some longer gaps between tracks and the songs were in a different order. Apart from that I think the situation is now under control.
I believe I mixed over 30 songs down to stereo over an intense 24 hour period. Normally I can only mix about 2 songs a day (at most) after a long month of procrastinated analysis.

My studio is now in storage in someone’s basement (Thanks Janet). I probably won’t see it for at least a year. By then it’ll be obsolete but I definitely got great use from it over about ten years.

PS. At the moment there are none left in stock but hopefully by early December 2011 they will be available.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#49 Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0800 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#48 Not with boots or gloves,
but with bare hand or foot.
Or any naked part of the body for that matter.
Maybe this should be Skinny Dipping Day.

Touch the Earth and let her touch you.
Take care of her. She's not well.
If she dies, we all die too.
I guess you knew that. But what the hell.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#48 Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:00:00 -0700 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#47
I guess I forgot to mention that I put out a new CD a while back. I think it was in September.
Well it's called Lavender and Gasoline and it's a fairly spooky affair.
Someone once asked me why I always left all the best bits off my CDs. I guess I wasn't sure how they'd be received but seeing as no one buys them anyway, it doesn't really matter.

There's a good variety of subject matter on L and G to keep folks engaged.

Kitty Jasmine is about breadline musicians and the sad tragedy of many of their lifes through musical history. Sadly since I last wrote about the Musician's Graveyard a few years back, there have been a few more graves filled.

Straw Hat is a fun song that refers to the mad outbreak of Irish bars across Europe. One guy opened one in his living room but got closed down a few days later.

Lavender and Gasoline is the story of US expansion and the situation of modern day Native Americans.

Trash Can. Pretty much an accurate description of our world today. This is what we've turned our beautiful planet into in just a couple of centuries.

28 days. Use your imagination.

World Fall. Politics and human nature.

River Reach. We're all off to the seaside.

Cat's Eyes: Road song.

Jenny: My Good friend Jenny who put everything right in daylight and destroyed it in darkness.

Volnay: Grape picking in France back in 96. It was a good year.

So there you have it.
If you want to listen to some samples then just go to cdbaby.com online.
Unfortunately their samples are a bit random. They seem to have pulled parts from the middle of verses or half way through solos. Even I was left scratching my head and I wrote them.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#47 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:00:00 -0800 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#46
I really don't know what to say but I guess I should say something.

When we first arrived in Regensburg, we often went to see Dave's band, The Fiascos, play at the Harp.
They formed part of the first impressions we had of Regensburg. When we left, Dave let us host our going away party at Gallagher's and what a party it was!

And in between that time, it really was an 8-year pub crawl for us.
Having said that though, I must add that Regensburg was home too. Our community was like family. We were all thrown together into that certain time and place. Whether we liked each other or not, we lived in each others pockets and for the most part I think we all looked out for each other.
Dave was part of that family. My Regensburg family. For my part I got on quite well with him. He had his daft moments but we were all daft back then.
As a musician he was not the world's best but he wrote catchy songs and could be quite a showman. He, Jim and Miller always put on a good show. We went along regularly to the Harp to see them play. I still remember some of his songs though I haven't heard them in over 10 years. "The Middle of the Desert" and, "Sandy" and "Change of Heart" and "Back on the Road Joe."

Dave hired me as a barman when he opened Gallagher's Irish Pub. Late at night well past closing time we'd sit at his bar with Tina the barmaid and listen to a Bill Withers Greatest Hits cassette. We'd put it on again and again night after night, and each time it ended we'd get the Jaegermeister out and we'd have a shot. I can't remember a thing we talked about but we'd sit there blethering and laughing incoherently for hours then I'd stagger happily home. I lived along the river out in Pruffening but Dave lived just across the Golden Ente Bridge. He'd spend his entire nights takings on a long circuitous taxi ride home because he didn't want robbed of his evening's profits. Robbed? On a good night he'd be lucky to have made the taxi fare.

Gallagher's wasn't a big success but on Thursdays there was the Live Blues Session downstairs in the Keller. Dave would get up and do what he did best; singing the blues. I'd play the bass, Peter Cosmic would play lead and Paul Whaley would play drums.
It was one of the highlights of my week.
I loved playing the bass with him on the Thursday night jams, we had such a blast.

I was working in Gallagher's one evening when Dave pokes his head around the bar and shouts urgently "quick, two Guinness." I pour them super fast and hurry them over to Dave. "There ye go. Who are they for" I ask? But Dave just looks at me and yells "How the FUCK should I know?"

Later on, the same night, I'm working away and Dave's involved in an animated discussion with someone at the bar and he turns to me and asks, "James, what's that famous Scottish whisky, Loch something?" and I say "Loch what" and he says "yeah! That's it! Loch What." And he turns back to the guy to finish the conversation. "Loch What. Great stuff”¦"

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦

We were playing the session in the Harp one Sunday. The usual bunch was there. Me, Peter, Michael, Steve, Tim and Dave. Maybe a few others. We were all seated around the session table and had been for some time. So we were all getting a bit rowdy.
I remember Dave and Tim were seated directly across from one another.
Dave sees Tim's cigarette packet sitting on the table. He says," Tim, can I have a cigarette?
Tim says, "Of course Dave."
Dave picks up the pack and opens it.
"It's your last cigarette Tim. Can I still have it?"
"Ah" says Tim. "You can't have that one. Any other one yes. But not that one."
Dave looks at the cigarette. "But there only is one!"
"Well that's too bad."
"So I can't have it?"
"Sorry Dave."
"Why Not?"
"That's my lucky cigarette."
"Lucky cigarette" scoffs Dave? "Yea right." And he takes the cigarette out the packet.
"Seriously" says Tim. Every time I buy a packet, I take one cigarette out and I flip it round and put it back in. It's my lucky cigarette."
Dave's eyes narrow. "You're joking”¦ right?"
"No joke."
"So can I take it?"
"Sorry Dave."
But Dave now has the cigarette between his fingers and has his lighter poised in the other hand.
"Don't light that cigarette Dave."
Dave puts the cigarette between his lips.
"Don't light that cigarette Dave. I'm warning you. It's my lucky cigarette."
Dave studies Tim. He clicks the lighter but it doesn't work.
Tim picks up a beer glass and holds it menacingly towards Dave. The tone of his voice changes. "If you light that fuckin' cigarette I'll break this fuckin' glass in your face. That's my lucky fuckin' cigarette."
Dave stops. His eyes widen. His eye brows go up.
The whole place is tense now. Tim and Dave are locked in a staring contest.

Since Tim first appeared in Regensburg, he'd had a reputation as a prankster. He had a great talent for dry humour. Even those who knew him well found it difficult to tell his acting from reality. Trouble was that he wasn't always joking.
On this occasion I'm not sure if Tim had decided yet whether he was joking or not. We all knew he'd never hurt anyone with the glass but I couldn't guess the punchline. Funnily enough, it was Dave who had the immortalised last words.

Tim is leaning low over the table: glass in hand like he wants Dave to talk into it. Dave upright: a freeze-frame with the lucky cigarette and lighter.
Tim growls. "That’s”¦ my”¦ fuckin'”¦ lucky”¦ cigarette."
There is a long pause.
Suddenly Dave leans back and lights it. "Not this one man. Hah." He guffaws and he lets out a big smoky demented laugh.
Tim laughs too, shrugs, and puts down the glass. "Ah well. Whatever. Had you going though, didn't I?" He wanders off to the cigarette machine.
Steve, at the far end of the table, stands up, raises his glass and through the smiling gap where Gresh had punched his front teeth out he shouts "Prost ya bastards." Then he picks up a guitar and sings Baltimore oriole.

Ride on Dave.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦.


There was one more incident that I think is very worth mentioning.
It happened shortly after Dave had opened Gallaghers.
As I recall, the place had been quite busy that night. I was sitting up at the bar with Simon. Brian McCrumb was there with his girlfriend. Tim was there.
Dave should have been pleased with business but instead he was getting uptight about something and he began to shout and insult everyone. At one point he disappeared into the toilets and I could hear muffled shouting and thumping. When he re-emerged he started ranting again. his face was red with the exertion of it all.
When it became clear that his tantrum was not going to end any time soon, the customers began to filter out. In a matter of minutes, his bar was deserted except for one guy who courageously stood by him; Tim Doud.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#46 Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 -0700 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#45
It's a fair bet that oil wasn't put on this earth to fuel cars.
It was here long before there were cars though it may not be here when the cars are gone.
There sure was a lot of it. Mother Nature spent a lot of energy producing it. It's hard to believe that it didn't serve some useful function.

The earth is a very symbiotic neighbourhood. Everything is here for a reason. There are no useless hitch hikers on Earth. It would seem logical that oil enjoyed a working relationship with whatever else was in its vicinity.

There are food chains and eco pyramids in place everywhere. Weather patterns and tides and seasons. Each leans on the other to create the natural world we know today.

I don't know much about oil but I can speculate. As far as I know oil takes a long time to form. There was once an awful lot of it. Seems our earth's belly must have been practically saturated with the stuff. Why was there so much? What did it do?
Using the theory that everything on earth has a use, then the oil must have been doing something. Was it lubricating the tectonic plates?
Or was there already a broken eco pyramid that had allowed this huge build up? Did the dinosaurs die so quickly that their bodies piled up and began forming this colossal reservoir of oil?

Not so long ago there was an explorer who discovered an orchid in some dark jungle. Its flower cup was so deep that no known insect could help it pollinate. It's a well known fact that moths help pollinate orchids. Many orchids have a specially adapted moth that can perform this tricky task. The explorer could not figure out how this orchid could multiply. He speculated that a moth with an extraordinarily long slender beak must exist to perform this task. So he kept watch for a very long time till finally one night he was rewarded. Sure enough his mystery moth appeared out of the dark with a bill like a fencing sword and did the deed.

My point being that the there did exist a symbiotic relationship that the explorer was able to speculate based on other case studies.

In the modern periodic table there are boxes reserved for elements that have not yet been discovered. Scientists know they exist because there are gaps in their mathematics. Mathematics never lie.


So oil: what does it do? Or more to the point what was its job on Earth that it's no longer doing?
Why was there so much? In nature when a predator is removed from the food chain, herbivores tend to prosper. This happened in Scotland when the wolves and bears and wild cats were removed, the land became overrun by deer (and crazy Scotsmen) who in turn overgrazed the land that had in turn been laid barren by the industrial revolution.
What would prey on oil? Did oil have a predator? Fire? Nowadays, due to the eternal movement of the continental plates, much of the Earth's oil is under sea beyond the natural reach of fire.
Without the predation of fire, has oil continued to mass produce on its own faster than it can break down. Was oil the very basis of life on the planet? Was it life at its crudest form ready to seep into the soil at a pre ordained trickle rate?
I guess now is the time to face the argument that perhaps man is now the only real predator of oil. He may well be but why would he wish to make it extinct? Is it a symbiotic relationship? No it's not.
In a hunter/prey relationship, how fast is the hunter? Just fast enough”¦sometimes. How fast is the prey? Not fast enough”¦..sometimes.
In the mankind/oil relationship, we have a one sided genocide in the favour of humanity.

In mankind's case we (the masses) generally have only a casual gas pump relationship with oil. Yes it makes our societies run but this is probably only a passing phase of history. "This is the tail end of the Petroleum Age." Kind of like the Stone Age, Iron Age etc. The oil will run out. It's simple arithmetic. When? More simple arithmetic. What will happen then? There will be some chaos then the world of men will focus elsewhere or we'll all kill each other and we'll revert back to the Stone Age.
In truth, most of us don't care about oil. Even those who think they do. It's a background noise. This being the case then it must be said that man and oil are currently involved in an economic power issue within a species. However it does affect other parallel food chains and eco systems. Drilling and spilling. Refining and storing. Shipping and trading. All of these activities displace flora and fauna world wide. Hopefully the oil will run out soon. It may be the best news this planet's had in centuries unless of course all that oil was actually doing something useful that no one wants to talk about. That might be bad news.

Perhaps oil is a barrier? Are what it is and where it is linked? Was oil a volatile liquid wall that existed between the surface and the furnace at the planet's core? Was it absorbing the inner heat and keeping us cooled? Is global warming in fact coming from our dysfunctional underground heating system?
When you think on it, our little crust of life is in a precarious place. A tight spot. Right below our feet we have an inferno. Hovering in the sky above us there is another one. A few degrees difference in our atmospheric temperature would wipe us out.

Or maybe the underground oil fields caught all the rock and dirt that must inevitably filter down gravitationally towards the Earths core. The oil would have absorbed them like digestive juices and somehow returned them slowly to the surface as crude oil. Without the help of the subterranean conveyor belt of oil, the earth would have eventually consumed itself. (In fire of all things).

Of course I do not have the answers but I am at least asking questions.
The last few years have finally seen a surge of comprehension of the inter relations between every species on Planet Earth. But oil remains a mystery. I can't help wondering if we are afraid to look at the damage we may have done as our leaders pillage for fossil fuel. We fear to peel off that bandage from our poor festering wounded planet. What's underneath? Will it be healthy or will it be gangrene? Will it be too late?
Our leaders make us share the guilt of this raping. They claim they drill to pacify the public demand. It is a circle of abuse. Kids follow their elders' examples. Each generation sees the Earth only as it is: not as it was.
The age of the electric car will coincide exactly with the last drips of oil being wrought from the Earth.
But we cannot ignore the injuries done to this one habitable planet. We need a pre-op leader who will take charge immediately and save what he can.
Right now our world leaders are business men. They live for profit. It's what they do. They can't help it. Clearly though a business man cannot also be a leader of people because he is consumed foremost with his profits and not for the well being of planets. That's all very well but they need rules to work by. Let them make all the profit they want but they must earn them without harm to the people or planet. You'd imagine that would be easy. But it seems not. Just look around at the wreckage of our home world. This is a galactic disaster.

I imagine that the business world should be relieved to have someone set rules that could define the game. Imagine a football match with only vague regulations and no referees; it would be madness. With a set of business rules that were strictly enforced, the economic game could become far more interesting and participants might even enjoy it more. Right now the corporate mentality is, "If I don't drill/mine/build it, then someone else will." This only hastens the end.
Even as I write, there is an oil spill disaster in the Caribbean. But oil business goes on as normal elsewhere. The countries around the Arctic Circle are looking North to drill more oil. Meanwhile, environmentalists are shouting about the rising sea levels and melting glaciers. Unfortunately they are too easily denounced by the oil men's media outlets as crackpots.
Our leaders' stupidity is stunning. They want to drill in the national Wildlife Refuge. Canada has strip mines dredging sludge for crude oil. It's an area so big that it's visible from space. Oil is heading for extinction. Has it no rights as an endangered substance? What can fill that void?
”¦”¦... But I digress”¦”¦...

”¦”¦Perhaps that vast oil reserve of the pre industrial age was intended as an emergency atmosphere in the event of a fatal worldly disaster. It could be unleashed into the dying atmosphere killing just about everything but putting a protective coating around the planet like paint on a fence post. Over time this black skin would shrink back smaller and smaller till life would once again find itself contemplating its future in a puddle of goo.

Right now we live in a world grown frail and fragile. Our planet is a crossword puzzle with one wrong answer that was inserted early on. It would have been wiser to erase that mistake right then and there but we continued down the junkie path till the answers began to correspond less and less and they finally dried up. Eventaully the puzzle lay undone.

There was a solution though. Simply go back. Erase the mistake. Continue on the proper path.
I think we all know this but are either afraid to make the commitment or we're frozen like a deer in a headlight.

Oils well that ends well.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦..

PS

Ever wonder about that asteroid belt we pass through every year. It looks to me suspiciously like debris from a planet that got blown to bits.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#45 Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 -0700 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#44 Every day is Earth Day.

Except Sunday which is... well it's Sun day.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#44 Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0700 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#43
They say that one of the best ways to improve your painting technique is to copy the masters.
In my Art class a few years ago I was copying a Cezanne: The Lac D'Annecy.
Apparently he didn't like this picture or Annecy but I was drawn to this painting because the point of view was of a place where I'd sat many times. Unfortunately I had trouble getting to grips with this picture. Mainly because I used 5 different copies of it and they were all completely different. So I gave up and switched to another Cezanne painting. This one was called something like "House With Crack" or "The Crack House." This was a lot more fun to paint than The Lac D'Annecy.

What becomes apparent in exercises like this, is the master's use and application of paint and his natural rhythm. It seems that every artist has an inborn trademark squiggle. I noticed that Cezanne often repeated a small simple up and down stroke especially with trees.
Van Gogh had a curved shape that often recurred in his backgrounds.
Me? I have a squiggle too. It's sort of an S shape or like an 8 on its side.
My art teacher also had her signature stroke. It reminded me of a gull seen from a middle distance, soaring on a sea breeze: a very romantic description for a small line on a page.

Recently I was trying to copy some of the Lascaux Cave paintings (from library books). When I began to copy the artist(s?) technique, it became a rather unexpected spiritual experience. As I pored over each dot or shaded area, I felt I was reconstructing an unknown person in my head. The artist after all had been dead for 18000 years. All clues of his life were in this work. This was more than a picture. It was an autobiography. My intrusion was a postmortem of the artist, his, life and culture.

Generally we admire a picture as a whole but when critiquing a picture we search deeper for hidden meaning and reason. When we set out to copy the techniques and style in a picture we enter the mind and hand of the artist. It becomes quite personal.

The Lascaux paintings are spectacular. Bold hands set these images down on stone. The Collecting of pigments and colours and making of tools to apply the paint would have taken premeditated thought and time. To bring all this together would have taken imagination and would have resulted in a degree of job satisfaction.

I didn't have to go to those lengths. I did my first attempts with chalk and charcoal which I figured would be similar to the basic tools of the state of the art Cro Magnon artist.
Mostly though I used oil crayons because they looked better. I wasn't drawing on rock either. I just used paper. I wasn't trying to pass off my picture as a perfect fake; I only wished to examine the construction of the pieces.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦.

There were two particular grottos worth of pictures that I focused on. The Laschaux caves and the Chauvet caves. (see Art gallery section for a few pictures.)
I found myself more engrossed in the Laschaux pictures than the Chauvet pictures.
Laschaux's artwork seemed to be painted mainly by one artist. That is probably not even remotely true but I had an impression of a distinct style. The pictures had colour, often warm colours. Many scenes overlapped but there wasn't the overcrowded feeling that dominated the Chauvet caves.

The Chauvet cave gave me the impression that an artist had been practicing within. Lots of images of the same animal are sketched side by side covering whole areas as if the artist was trying to get it just right. There seemed to be several artists' work on display in the Chauvet cave. Some pictures, (EG the rhinos), looked very accomplished while others like a picture of a leopard have the style of an 8 year old child.

Theoretically, I guess art can vary in the same way that subspecies adapt to climate and terrain. People drew with what was at hand. They'd utilize native clays, muds, and stones. They'd paint what they saw when they could. Would it be so strange for people of a certain cave to have an individual style passed down through generations? This could explain the unique approaches to art in different areas.
I have noticed several times in modern villages with a small school that everyone seemed to have the same handwriting. I guess this is what can happen when one teacher teaches a whole community to write.
I suppose the same could happen with cave art techniques being passed down through the generations of a tight knit clan.

The first picture I drew was the black bull from the Lascaux cave. When I began to draw, at first all I saw was a bull. But as my concentration kicked in, I saw a distinct style to the work. I started by laying down the contours of an elegant backbone then curved along the tapering solid muscle of the upper forelegs, down to the delicate ankles and the low slung belly. I felt I was tracing an ancient road laid down by an unwitting historian. Considering the simplicity of the strokes, they conveyed a lot of detail.
Shading the torso, I noticed the hidden reds just showing through the black. Then I noticed it had a black horizontal stripe running along the belly. It was quite well hidden. It looked like the black stripe from a gazelle. Perhaps this bull is in fact a relative of the modern eland. Most likely though it's obviously an Aurochs. There was also a pale stripe that runs below the black stripe.
Copying this picture took me about half an hour but my picture was small. Had I drawn it full size, it would obviously have taken longer: though probably not by much. Copying something is far easier than creating something. I mention this though as I think it's an important factor when making presumptions about the pictures creation. If the artist spent two hours on the bull, that's not really a long time. We're not talking Cystine Chapel stuff here. Plenty of time left over for a few more pictures. So perhaps the art was all painted in the same week 18,000 years ago. No doubt carbon dating or something has discarded that notion as nonsense, but it's fun to think about.
Next I attempted a horse. These ancient horses always remind me of the Przwalskies Horse which I understand lives out near Mongolia these days and is quite rare and unpronounceable.
I get the impression that the same artist has produced this work but there are subtle differences. Most of the solid lines are used to draw the legs and hooves. The backbone is constructed of short strokes. The mane is a solid dark mass similar to a zebra mane. The ears appear more like pronghorn horns but it may just have been due to some flaking on the walls. The colouring is a shade of bay which seems to have been applied quickly but accurately in order to give the body a barreled shape. Perhaps it was pregnant. Arrows appear to have been shot at it. But they protrude from the ground and not from the horse.
This makes me think on Artistic License. The Artist was apparently painting a hunt. He could have chosen to draw the arrows sticking in the horse's body but he didn't. Did the horse escape? If so then why? Did one of the arrows belong to the artist? The angle of the arrows suggests that the hunters were ahead of the horse and a little to the side when they fired their arrows. Could this be a real live recorded historical event? The artist may even have been poking fun at himself: depicting himself as a terrible hunter. If I had to name this picture I'd call it, "The one that got away."
The big question though is did they have bows and arrows back then? I thought bows weren't invented till about 10,000 years ago. Or are those just little spears? They may have had spear throwers. Or are they just 2 blades of grass? If they are blades of grass then they are the only vegetation pictured in the cave.

The lines of the horse's legs are especially noteworthy. The ends all appear to have been carefully curved. This artist didn't like jagged edges on his Pictures. Even horns curve gracefully. perhaps this was his trademark squiggle. The horse's belly appears white but has been left unpainted. The natural colour of the rock fills in this detail.
Disproportionate heads are also a common feature. It seems that horses have traditionally been painted with small heads right up through the 19th century. It shouldn't be a surprise to find the practice goes way back to the Ice Age.

These two pictures seemed to be each composed of only two solid lines. The solid line of the backbone and the lines of legs and underbelly. The rest is filled in by colour. Both the bull and the horse are in motion.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦

In what must have been an era of carnal desperation when mankind held only a mid table position at best on the food chain, I am amazed to imagine some guy coming home from wrestling with wild beasts and saying to himself, I think I'll do a bit of painting. Maybe it was therapeutic.
I wonder if the whole clan watched him paint or did he (or she)do it in the wee hours while everyone slept. Did he have a sketching alcove? His studio? Was an area reserved to practice before the main picture was tackled? This could explain his uncluttered walls.

I have heard that there is a picture of a shaman in the Lascaux collection. (I haven't seen all the paintings). Could this also be a self portrait? Was he a shaman? Was he old? Was the artist an old woman? Perhaps someone with some time on their hands.
On the whole, life didn't seem too bad. The pictures are not the work of disturbed individuals. The scenes are of animals and hunting as would be expected but there is very little gore and carnage. They seemed a straight forward, uncomplex people with a strong hunting culture who respected the animals they killed. I'd guess that this tribe wasn't strictly vegetarian. I don't see any murals of giant carrots or broccoli on the walls.

From the Chauvet cave, I drew a rhino. Just a head actually. I love the simplicity of this picture. It gives the impression that it was drawn in one sweeping stroke. I doubt it was though because of the roughness of the walls but however it was painted, it is a wonderful work of art. It almost looks like it's smiling. A caricature?
This Rhino is very similar in style to the horse picture in Laschaux. Both artists have used the darkest colours to emphasize important features like the Rhino's horns and the horse's mane and limbs.

One prominent feature of the Chauvet art work is the overlaying of pictures one on top of another. Many of these pictures focus only on the head. Many are black and white with only pale traces of colour. This may have been due to unavailability of pigments or the colours have faded. Or maybe the artist liked working in monochrome.
This overlapping gives a sense of abstract to many of the artworks. The horses and rhino scene which depicts about 5 horses does appear to be painted by the same person. Likewise the lion pictures would seem to all be one person's handiwork. Did the same person paint both scenes? I don't know. Is it an example of students of the same school of art that we spoke of earlier.
Horses and lions both lived in herds or prides. It would be natural to draw them in that environment. Rhinos are more solitary which could be why they are depicted alone or singular.
I can't help thinking that the lions seem a bit too modern. The style of the sketches reminds me of a book I have about how to draw animals. Maybe there's a fraud out there.

I have to admire these artists for what they have accomplished. If only our modern art will be so long lived and still be bio-degradable. Those artists worked on the field using basic tools at best. They had to study those animals and learn their gestures and anatomy while trying not to get eaten. They were lucky just to get back home. I doubt posterity was on their mind.
They had no cameras or field guides for reference work either. Information was stored in the head till it was rendered onto the wall.
That's dedication.

..................

I was in Yellowstone last year and I got a bunch of brochures and stuff at the ranger's office. There was a fold out map with a picture of all the animals we could expect to see in the park. They were all posed side by side like a happy family. There were plenty of them too: elk, moose,wolf, bear, beaver, pronghorn etc. I guess if you are careful, Yellowstone provides a great opportunity for sketching animals in the wild. Just as long as you're always looking over your shoulder and have good running shoes you'll be fine. Here's an extra hint for Neo Magnons out there. It might be best to draw from behind a bison proof windshield.

Nowadays the Yellowstone animal population is probably a mere fraction of its glory day numbers. We can only speculate how dangerous it must have once been. We can hardly appreciate the difficulties facing an average stone age artist who lived in a far busier Yellowstone environment that spanned the entire world.

A few days later in nearby Bozeman, I walked into an art gallery. There was some nice stuff but it was so expensive. There was an oil picture of a rough and mean grizzly bear. It was a great painting but it did make me wonder if the artist had drawn it in the wild or not. That giant grizzly was standing way too close to be casually sketched in safety. My bet was that the artist, being smart, either took a telephoto picture or just copied it straight out a book. That's fair enough. There's no need to die for your art but it did seem a bit like cheating.
Anyway as I was leaving the gallery, I saw an enormous abstract painting of a bunch of Yellowstone's wildlife. They were all standing in a row and all their features had been blurred into the background. I was admiring it and its stunning 4 figure price tag when I realized I'd seen this picture before but in a different incarnation. Yes indeed it was the thinly disguised picture from the Yellowstone brochure.
I wonder which master he'd been studying?]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#43 Sun, 04 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0700 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#42 Sammish Woods Montessori School
23rd March till April 1st

I am not a teacher and I don't pretend to be one either. I have no teaching qualifications whatsoever. I do have some experience teaching individual guitar lessons but I have never taught a whole class at one time.
When the regular music teacher at the Montessori school went on tour for a few weeks somehow I was proposed as a candidate to fill in for him. I accepted the challenge though I had no idea what I was supposed to do. I hadn't a clue what the kids knew or what they normally did. So in I went flying totally blind”¦ to”¦ eh”¦ teach them”¦ something”¦ maybe.
I must say I was a bit apprehensive.

There were about 12 kids in the first class. Their ages ranged between 6 and 10 years old. I'd brought along a big bag of percussion instruments to see what would happen.
I introduced each instrument and gave a quick demonstration of its super powers. Then I passed them round till they all had one each. The kids shook them and rattled them as recommended. One kid took a bite out of my spinning wind tube and left lasting teeth prints. Then we sang some songs till just as it was getting a little over-chaotic, it was over.
Time had passed fairly quickly but I realized that 45 minutes might be quite demanding to keep 6 to 10 year olds engaged. By the end of the lesson, the natives had become undoubtedly restless.

Next class was for 3 to 6 year olds. There were only about 8 of them. If it came to a fight, I think I could take them.
"Sounds like a woodpecker", said one authorative kid as they all listened with one ear pressed against the guitar. An unusual conclusion I thought: but there ye go. He could always have added, "Or a Strumming Bird."
This class was only a half hour long. By the time we'd tortured the instruments and sang the songs of their choice, time was up.
I'd deliberately omitted the noisier instruments this time.

The 3rd class was 6 to 10 year olds. But a different bunch. This dozen were the rowdiest of all. By the end, they were ganging up on me like the Children of the Corn. Too late I remembered a subtle warning that the kids would test me. They did indeed but I lived to laugh another day.

The last class of the week were a friendly little crew of 3 to 6 year olds. They were so mellow and happy and just wanted to sing and dance. We played the Grand old Duke of York and The wheels on the bus etc. All the hits. It was just like Paddy's Night except everyone was sober. We had a lot of fun.
This class had the least politics of all the classes. Politics? Yes I too was surprised by the political undercurrents already prevalent at this level.

So that was week one. I'd been tossed in the deep end of the kiddies' pool but I was still swimming.
I'd learned that keeping kids engaged for the duration was tricky but vital to the success of the class. I'd learned to avoid the noisier percussive instruments as that inevitably led to raised voices. Thirdly I'd learned that the kids were smart and witty and demanded a level of respect.
Fourthly, I now knew I better come up with some new ideas quick.
Onward into week two.

The first class of the new week was with the original 6 to 10 years olds again. At the kids' prompting we played a name game. They all told me their names then I closed my eyes while they all shuffled around and I had to guess who was who. They really enjoyed that. I am notoriously bad at names. They go in one ear and out the other (if they even get that far). Somehow I managed to remember most of their names after 2 games. I don't know if I can still remember them now.
Next we sang a few songs. Even though this was the 6 to 10 year olds class, they got as much satisfaction from the Grand Old Duke of York as the younger class.
After that we played Guess the Sound. I rattled some bear bells attached to a small strap hidden in my mystery bag while they had to guess what it was. Of course they sussed it right away. I set it down on the floor and invited them to try pick it up and put it on their head without it jingling. They all took turns and though none of them managed it, they were totally engrossed for ten very hushed minutes.
Disgusted by their own failure they turned their suspicious gaze on me and demanded to see if I could do any better. For a brief moment I had a fleeting vision of a corn field ablaze and a wicker man in flames. It seemed I had no choice but to comply. I managed to raise it a few inches off the ground and they were all holding their breathe in utter silence when I suddenly yelled "Boo" and they all screamed.
Next, they produced a book with a fox song which was their favourite. They sang it for me and I was very impressed. They said they planned to record it.
To finish up we sang, Jack and the Beanstalk. Which they all loved and wanted to hear again. This was a relief because I'd written it just the day before based on the story but with more stunts.
This class was the best so far and I felt we were getting to understand one another.
The Name Game really helped. It immediately broke down the communication barrier. I learned that teaching familiar faces is far easier that teaching strangers.

The 3 to 6 year old class was a strange one. Right from the start the kids seemed distracted. I went with the flow and left them to their own devices while I sang quietly till the half hour was up. Some drifted back but others had little projects they were working on. Everyone seemed content.

At the next class of 6 to 10 year olds, I basically repeated the same class I did with the other 6 to 10 year olds. One thing I noticed by accident was that when I sat on a low chair when I was with the older kids, it made a big difference for the better in their behavior. When I sat on the floor with them they were rowdier. Interesting.
At one point in this class they had a long discussion about whether or not 2 boys should be removed from the circle due to their disruptive behavior. I was surprised how much back and forth discussion took place over the issue. They took it very seriously. I told them I'd let them debate it like a jury then I'd be judge. They all liked this idea. Well all but the 2 accused. The Children of the Corn were morphing into the Lord of the Flies. And just to show it, I taught them how to dance the Dying Fly. Sentence was delayed.
I wouldn't be surprised if the 2 disruptive kids turned out to be the musicians of the class in years to come.

The last class were the happy bunch of 3 to 6 year olds. They too demanded something different but were happy in the end to have some egg shakers and to dance and sing their favourites: The Wheels on the Bus, itsy Bitsy spider, and If You're Happy And You Know It.
My last memory of my 2 weeks is of the 3 to 6 year olds all sitting in a row on the floor, howling like an innocent little pack of wolf cubs as we sang Old Macdonald Had a Farm.
It was 2:55pm and their parents had come to take them home.

The biggest thing I learned apart from confirmation that I am not a teacher was that teaching kids can be a lot of fun but hard work.
The most advantageous tiny thing that helped us begin to form an understanding was the Name Game. Rather than adopting an attitude that I would never see these kids again so why bother learning names, we played the game and had a good laugh about it.
My two weeks for me were a real positive experience. I have a greater respect than ever for the teachers who do the groundwork introducing children to their very first songs and who teach them to sing and dance from nothing. I also gained an admiration for the many anonymous songwriters who pen these children's songs. As adults, we may laugh but in many ways these little ditties are ingenious.
The kids themselves were amazing. They are bundles of life. Their energy and capacity to learn was overwhelming and non stop. It must be hard graft for teachers who spend their whole week in the company of inquisitive kids. The energy it takes must be well off the caffeine scale. I find it hard enough looking after my own 5 year old all day. And there's only one of him.

Summing it all up, I'd say they taught me more than I taught them. I hope I don't forget their names.
I don't know what they learned. Hopefully they didn't regress.
The Dying Fly will of course always be useful in any situation.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦

Disinterest at best was the biggest encouragement I got as I encountered my first clumsy guitar chords in Scotland. At least my family never told me to shut up. They probably couldn't hear me over the rest of the racket that was going on in our household. We were a family of ten. There were 3 upstairs rooms. Each had its own record player. Often they were all blaring different songs simultaneously. Down in the living room, my Father would be standing in his string vest by the fire place bellowing out, "There's a Hundred Pipers In A In A." Radios blared, the T.V. yelled, Spin dryers rattled, dogs barked and folks bashed guitars, pianos and each other. It was a lively place; not that big, yet easy to get lost in.

Primary school produced some nasty musical negativity from a teacher who will remain anonymous. This individual ridiculed anyone he thought sang out of tune. He never offered any constructive criticism, just regular beatings with his belt. Sometimes he'd take the whole class for singing lessons and have us singing the glories of St Thomas. We dreaded these music lessons. We'd sing like a child choir while he'd come round and listen to each of us individually. If he thought anyone was crap he'd tell them to keep moving their lips but not to sing. Then to rub it in, he'd make the rest of the kids stop in mid song while about 5 of us were forced to mime like drowning fish. We'd mime for our lives because we didn't want to get, "The belt." Everyone had a great laugh except us unlucky mimes. When the lesson was over Mr. Teacher would belt us all anyway. Good times.
So not much luck there on the music front.

Next stop was St Lukes High School Barrhead. By now I was aged about 11.

Half of the old St Lukes high school was down by Commercial Rd. The other half was about a mile away on the Barrhead Main Street beside the new sports centre. The new Sports centre looked like an enormous red brick. The St Lukes' Annex building next door looked like a grey prison. Inside the Annex there was an indoor courtyard from which many doors opened onto like prison cells. Above, was an identical situation with a walkway with a cast iron railing. Each of these rooms held classes. They were high ceilinged and the windows were above head height so if we looked up and out we saw only grey sky. The walls were coated with green flaking paint that reminded me of Florence Nightingale era hospital wards.
As you can imagine, it was a dull and dreary place. Teachers and pupils went through the motions of an unimaginative education designed to supply the bare necessities for another lethargic Scottish generation already destined for factories, unemployment and real prison.
At that time I don't believe there was even an exam at the end of the 4 years. Punishment was still being meted out by teachers armed with leather straps just like primary school.
These belts were curiosities; simply because they were standard equipment: not just a belt off someone's trousers. They were made from a strip of leather about 2 feet long and about a half inch thick. One half was slit like a forked tongue. It was often carried concealed under the shoulder of a coat where it was readily at hand to be whipped out at the merest hint of a mis-spelt word. Undeniably it was a weapon with a premeditated function.
I imagine that newly minted teachers must have bought them at the same store they bought their text books and stationary. Was there a seedy room in the back where they tested them out? Did teachers discuss techniques in the staff room? Did they practice every night after school like golfers working on their swing? Were there belting classes at university as part of their teacher training course?
This belting nonsense continued up till the very year I left school. Just my luck.

The music class such as it was, was located at the far right hand corner of the inner courtyard. It was conducted by a chain smoking old crone with hawk like features and hair tied up in an ash grey bun. She was thin as a twig and her voice was brittle and harsh as a bad tempered crow. She treated us with open hatred; deeming us worthless twits. She saw her job of teaching us spud heads, the equivalent of banishment to Siberia to tutor a colony of monkeys.

The classroom was sparsely furnished. There was an upright piano, an ash tray, and rows of little writing desks all designed for right handed people (Of which I wasn't one.) Due to her chain-smoking and careless stubbing out of cigarettes, the teacher's half of the class looked like an oncoming storm front creeping over the piano towards us like clouds over crags. This smoke seemed to stick to the nicotine stained walls and climb slowly up to the ceiling where it thickened and brooded throughout the one hour lesson.
It was no wonder that half the class became chain smokers too.

Every Friday as the very last class of the school week, the old bat gave out music books containing big lists of musical terms. Our instructions were simple. "Copy out this book", page after page until the bell rings. There was never any explanation as to what these words meant or what they had to do with music. The book read like an Italian Yellow Pages. It may well have been a pizzeria directory.
The class was held in complete silence except for the occasional rustle of paper and the tiny scratching of pencils. One day someone farted. It broke the silence like a gunshot. We erupted into pitiful pent up laughter. The teacher marched out from behind her piano like a furious trapdoor spider. Usually all we saw of her was the fog of her cigarette smoke and the occasional sad tinkle of some vague jazz tune like a smoldering memory of some lost love that she'd throttle like a chicken if she ever saw again”¦.
For now though, she'd have to take it out on us unfortunates.
"Who did that" she shrieked at us?
There was no reply. She repeated the question and got the same response. Naturally the guilty farter didn't want to get belted. Anyway how could she ever know who it was unless she went round and sniffed everybody's bum?
"No one is leaving this class till I know who made that noise."
That was a serious ultimatum because all the Neilston people had to catch the four o clock bus home or face a 3 mile hike.
The clock ticked slowly on towards 4pm.
With 1 minute to go Tom Daly spoke up. "It was me Miss."
"Step out here now."
Tom was swiftly belted several times then the bell rang and off we went to catch our bus.
The odd thing though was that it hadn't been him at all. He'd just confessed because he didn't want to walk home. I don't know who did it. There's a guilty farter out there to this day running free.

She asked us one day if anyone played a musical instrument. I don't know why but I decided to put my hand in the air. "I play some guitar" I said timidly. "What kind of music?"
"Paul Simon kind of stuff"
"Pah", she spat like she'd swallowed a fly. "Rubbish. That is not music."
I went home later and quietly put the Paul Simon book away. In the future I'd just keep my mouth shut.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦.

There came a day when the smoke that pumped rhythmically from behind her piano barricade stopped rising. It was our first clear day in class and we discovered that the mysterious dark abyss in the far wall that came and went in her smog, was in fact a blackboard. She stepped out and surveyed the class. "You" she snapped, pointing to a boy at the back. "Lawson. Yes you. Come here."
Lawson wasn't the brightest bulb in a class already feeding near the bottom of the Brichter scale. He stepped forward, wondering what he'd done wrong.
The crone opened her purse and handed him some money. "Go across to the shop and get me 10 Embassy Regal (cigarettes)."
"What if the don't have Regal?"
"Get John Player Special."
"What if the don't have”¦"
"Then just get anything" she barked exasperated.
Lawson returned a half hour later carrying a brown paper bag. He handed it to the teacher. She opened it suspiciously and gingerly drew out a sausage roll and then a cold mince pie.
"What's this", she yelled.
Lawson looked at her in complete innocence and said, "You said if they didn't have your brand then just get anything."

Well I didn't learn much in that class. It lasted a year. That's about 3650 cigarettes in the crone's measurements.
Looking back I have to say that the unaccredited fart was the most musical event in that whole class year. I wonder what key it was in.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦.

Though I continued to potter around with music at home, I never drew any connection between school music and my love of music at home. They were worlds apart. Unrelated entities. School music was cold and cruel while music at home was pleasant and fulfilling; even magical. It was a world of discovery.
At home, I was never prompted or forced to play guitar. I just did it. No one said shut up and no one said play louder.
No news is good news.
”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦..

Apparently the old St Lukes building was sinking. So a new Super Unsinkable St Lukes was built up at the top of Auchenbach. I must say it was a much nicer environment to learn nothing in. It was set high above the town of Barrhead like a fortress of education. From the art class we could see the Highlands and the Erskine Bridge (10 miles away) crossing the Clyde. But this school too had its dungeons. Down in the bare unfinished passageways where faucets dripped and dim lights spluttered, were classrooms behind heavy ominous soundproof doors. Here, where no one could hear our screams, we were given further music lessons.

But I learned nothing. We had a new teacher. I tapped some beats on a piano top. That's all I remember. We had lessons for a year.

That was the end of my school music career. I spent a further 4 years at that school but never returned to that underworld again in all that time. Nor did I miss it.

In fairness it must be mentioned the new St Lukes education program had been rewritten and updated. There were many new teachers who were actually enthusiastic about their work. The art department was open plan with large windows that let the sunlight pour in. The school now offered finishing exams with an opportunity to take further exams as university qualifications. I think it became a well respected school and I believe it deserved that praise. It rose from the swamp and ascended to the top of the hill.

I was up in the art department one day drawing a skull when a classmate lent me a cassette of a band called Rush. I'd never heard of them. It was a live album called "All the World's a Stage". When I listened to it, I didn't know what to make of it. The melodies were disjointed and the singer had a helium high voice but there was something that attracted me to it. I don't know what it was. The music gave me the sensation that I'd missed something. I listened to it several times back to back and still couldn't put my finger on it. Could it be that it was just plain interesting? Here I was listening to a band I knew nothing about. I had no preconceptions. I was judging this faceless music only on what I was hearing and I found it an enjoyable experience. I realized that this music was not composed to be instantly catchy. This was music written to slowly seep into the senses. It wasn't sweet like pop, it was salt.
After I heard a few more albums, I bought a big thick Rush song book. Their chords were unusual and fresh. This was not a Dylan play-along colouring book; this was, by my standards, complex stuff. For the first time since I'd closed the Paul Simon episode, my guitar playing crept forward. I'd opened a new chapter and soon learned the whole book.

I guess I've moved on from most of my heavy rock phase but I can still appreciate those Rush albums and the band's imagination. I believe they're still out their doing it.

”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦.

My musical education was obviously never going to happen in a classroom but I think the Montessori kids already have a great start. Someone up there is doing a good job. At least the kids don't dread their music lessons.
Staring out the window up there at the kids' school reminded me of looking out the art department window back at the new St Lukes. From up there in Auchenbach I could see the huge Clyde Valley and the distant Scottish Highlands. I could also see the discarded shell of the old St Lukes buildings and the music room where we learned more about beatings than beats. Here in Bellingham I gaze out over the San Juan Islands towards the open Pacific. Behind me in the class, I hear children laughing and making a terrible din from rattles and shakers. I know I should go tell them to behave but it's a great sound.

One verse leads to another.]]> http://jameshigginsmusician.com/news.html#42 Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0700 Scottish contemporary singer/songwriter - James Higgins - Meanderings